The New York Times (3/11, Frakt, Carroll) reports, “An updated systematic review published” online March 11 in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews “found that A.A. (Alcoholics Anonymous) leads to increased rates and lengths of abstinence compared with other common treatments.” Additionally, “Alcoholics Anonymous not only produced higher rates of abstinence and remission, but it also did so at a lower cost, the Cochrane review found. A.A. meetings are free to attend,” while treatments using the healthcare system can be expensive.
USA Today (3/11, Rodriguez, O’Donnell) reports the review “had the opposite findings of a similar study published by Cochrane in 2006 that found ‘no experimental studies unequivocally demonstrated the effectiveness of AA or TSF (Twelve-step facilitation) approaches for reducing alcohol dependence of problems.’”
Reuters (3/11, Carroll) reports, “In an analysis of pooled data from 27 earlier studies, researchers found a 20% higher rate of abstinence for one year among people who attended AA or a 12-step program that encourages participation in AA.” Included in the review were “studies that compared 12-step programs to other addiction treatments.” The 27 studies “included 10,565 patients with an average age of 34.”
Providing similar coverage are Newsweek (3/11, Crowley) and Healio (3/11, Gramigna).
Related Links:
— “Alcoholics Anonymous vs. Other Approaches: The Evidence Is Now In, “Austin Frakt and Aaron E. Carroll, The New York Times, March 11, 2020