According to Reuters (1/29, Rapaport), a study published online Jan. 29 in Pediatrics reveals that women who are obese while pregnant may have nearly double the likelihood of giving birth to a child with autism. When expectant mothers are both obese and diabetic, the risk for autism in their offspring may be quadrupled. Researchers arrived at these conclusions after examining data on some 2,734 pairs of mothers and babies tracked between 1998 and 2014.

Related Links:

— “Maternal obesity, diabetes tied to increased autism risk in kids,” Lisa Rapaport, Reuters, January 29, 2016.

CNN (1/25, Grinberg) reports that the American Psychiatric Association “has called for the development and testing of better methods to identify high-risk individuals who should be denied gun access, implying that current criteria under federal law related to mental illness are inadequate to serve as a basis for gun disqualification.”

In a position statement, the APA points out that “while research shows most people diagnosed with serious mental health conditions are never violent toward others, and most violent individuals do not suffer from these major mental disorders, merely having a diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder should not be the only basis for disqualification from firearms.”

Some “common mental health conditions – including personality disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorder – tend to be associated with the risky mix of pathological anger with gun access,” the APA has found.

Related Links:

— “Gun violence not a mental health issue, experts say, pointing to ‘anger,’ suicides,” Emanuella Grinberg, CNN, January 25, 2016.

In a 2,500-word article titled “As Mass Killings Rise, How Can Sheriffs Keep Guns From Mentally Unstable?,” McClatchy (1/22, Gordon) reported, “Addressing the obstacles to keeping firearms away from mentally troubled people has emerged as an area of potential common ground among some stakeholders in the…debate over gun control.” But, “any attempt at compromises is sure to be complicated by thorny legal, ethical and political questions over how to balance mental health patients’ privacy, Americans’ Second Amendment rights…and the need to keep guns away from those posing a clear danger.”

Related Links:

— “As mass killings rise, how can sheriffs keep guns from mentally unstable?,” Greg Gordon, McClatchy, January 22, 2016.

In a nearly 1,600-word article, the Scientific American (1/25, Landhuis) reports, “Recent studies in North America, the UK and Europe suggest that dementia risk among seniors in some high-income countries has dropped steadily over the past 25 years.” Should that trend be “driven by midlife factors such as building ‘brain reserve’ and maintaining heart health, as some experts suspect, this could lend credence to staying mentally engaged and taking cholesterol-lowering drugs as preventive measures.”

Related Links:

— “Is Dementia Risk Falling?,” Esther Landhuis, Scientific American, January 25, 2016.

Karen Ranus and Greg Hansch, both of NAMI Texas, and Dennis Borel, of the Coalition of Texans with Disabilities, write in the Austin (TX) American-Statesman (1/26, Subscription Publication) that “because guns are now allowed in Texas’ 10 state-run psychiatric hospitals, individuals accessing treatment for serious and persistent mental health conditions are now at higher risk for trauma and more vulnerable to suicide.” The trio says that “as advocates for individuals with mental illness and their families,” they “have grave concerns about this major policy shift, which allows the open carry of guns in areas used in the treatment and care of a highly vulnerable population in our state hospitals.”

Related Links:

— “Commentary: Open carry in state hospitals fails to protect vulnerable,” Karen Ranus, Greg Hansch, and Dennis Borel, Austin American-Statesman, January 26, 2016.